Catholics Urge Amnesty International to Maintain Neutral Stance on Abortion
<<   September/2006   >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Arts
Movies
Humor
Television
Music

Business
Internet
Finance
Jobs
Investing
Economy

Computers
Software
Hardware
World
Mobile

Games
Video Games
RPGs

Health
Fitness
Medicine
Alternative

Home
Consumers
Cooking

Recreation
Travel
Food
Outdoors

Reference
Psychology
Science
Education

Regional
US
Canada
Europe

Science
NSF
Space
Technology

Society
People
Religion

Sports
Baseball
Soccer
Basketball
 
04/Sep/2006 2:14AM
The Catholic Bishops of England and Wales have issued an appeal to Amnesty International to maintain its neutral stance on abortion, following the charity’s proposals to change the position it has held since it was set up in 1961.

Amnesty is proposing at first to advocate a woman’s right to access to abortion in the case of rape, sexual assault, incest and risk to her life, and then to advocate a woman’s right to access to abortion in general.

Although the Catholic Church shares Amnesty’s concern for the most vulnerable, it does not believe that removing the rights of the unborn child is consistent with Amnesty’s core values.

The Bishop of East Anglia, the Right Reverend Michael Evans, a member of the charity, warned that Amnesty risked losing Catholic support of its vital work if the organisation proceeded with this proposal.

“It would be difficult for Catholics and many others to continue as members of an organisation which did not include the unborn child in its campaign to “Protect the Human,” said Bishop Evans.

In the statement from the Catholic Bishops’ Conference on Amnesty International, the church noted: “Any comprehensive campaign to ‘Protect the Human’ must include a solid commitment to protect the human rights of the unborn child, among the most defenceless of all humans.

Cherishing Life, a document published by the Catholic Bishops of England and Wales in 2004, states, "Taking the life of a child in the womb is as unjust to the unborn child as taking the life of a new-born baby is to the infant.

“We do not believe that to support removing the rights of the unborn child is consistent with Amnesty’s core values. Such a policy change would, in the eyes of many, compromise Amnesty as a trusted advocate for human rights. Furthermore, such a decision would almost certainly divide its membership and undermine the vital work for which it was founded and for which it is justly renowned.”


Recent news in category
Scottish Executive Launches More AntiSectarian Material for Schools
Tearfund Encourages Churchgoers to See Film Highlighting Climate Change
Koreans Honour Scottish Father of the Bible

Global recent news
4 new mini-laptops -- which is smallest, lightest, best?
Marc Anthony To Pay $2.5 M in Back Taxes
Assn. for Fire Ecology Regional Conference 2008 in Tucson Jan 28th-31st

04/Sep/2006 2:07AM
One of the worlds largest Christian referral ministries addressing homosexual issues and helping individuals recover from homosexuality

04/Sep/2006 1:55AM
The General Secretary of the World Council of Churches WCC Rev Dr Samuel Kobia has issued an urgent call for a comprehensive

04/Sep/2006 1:52AM
The spiritual head of the Anglican Communion Dr Rowan Williams has set the dates for an urgent crisis meeting of American Episcopal bishops

04/Sep/2006 1:47AM
Pray Without Ceasing a 14month prayer marathon hosted by the Methodist Church concluded recently as church members celebrated the fruits of the venture

04/Sep/2006 1:46AM
The Orthodox Christian religion is being made a mandatory school subject in four of Russias regions as supporters claim that it will help protect

Copyright © 2006 Rootio Ltd. All rights reserved.