E-mail etiquette: To reply or not to reply, that is the question
<<   August/2007   >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Arts
Movies
Humor
Television
Music

Business
Internet
Finance
Jobs
Investing
Economy

Computers
Software
Hardware
World
Mobile

Games
Video Games
RPGs

Health
Fitness
Medicine
Alternative

Home
Consumers
Cooking

Recreation
Travel
Food
Outdoors

Reference
Psychology
Science
Education

Regional
US
Canada
Europe

Science
NSF
Space
Technology

Society
People
Religion

Sports
Baseball
Soccer
Basketball
 
27/Aug/2007 1:08PM
E-mail etiquette: To reply or not to reply, that is the question

That's the thing about etiquette. Everybody thinks they're polite, and it's the other guy whose behavior warrants correction. Doug Schweitzer thinks it's rude not to reply to e-mail:
It takes just a second to say "Got your message. I'll get back to you soon." My question: Why should I reply just to say I'll reply some other time?

My own complaint is the exact opposite. In fact, I hesitate to e-mail those people who seem to reply immediately to every single message. It's like playing tag. You're it!

In a Carpenter world:

1/1/01, 10:01 am
To Sue
From Sally
Hi. Haven't heard from you in a while. I hope all is well. Some of us might get together for coffee one day next month. Would you be interested in coming? It'd be great to see you.

1/1/01, 11:06 am
To Sally
From Sue
Coffee sounds great. Let me know the time and place sometime next month.

I imagine the following in a Schweitzer world:

1/1/01, 10:01 am
To Sue
From Sally
Hi. Haven't heard from you in a while. I hope all is well. Some of us might get together for coffee one day next month. Would you be interested in joining us? It'd be great to see you. :-)

1/1/01, 10:02 am
To Sally
From Sue
Got your message. :-) I'll get back to you soon.

> At 10:01am on 1/1/01, Sally wrote:
>Hi. Haven't heard from you in a while. I hope all is well. Some of us might together
> for coffee one day next month. Would you be interested in joining us? It'd be great to
> see you. :-)

1/1/01, 10:03 am
To Sue
From Sally
Great! I look forward to hearing from you! :-) :-)

[I'll leave the quoted back portion to your imagination.]

1/1/01, 10:04 am
To Sally
From Sue
Thanks. I know my real messages are well worth the read. :-) :-) :-) I'll try to make it especially noteworthy ... once I actually get around to it, of course. ;-)

1/1/01, 10:05 am
To Sue
From Sally
Great!!! I really look forward to hearing from you!!!

1/1/01, 10:06 am
To Sally
From Sue
Any minute now.

...

1/1/01, 11:06 am
To Sally
From Sue
Hey. So sorry for the delay! I'm just finally getting a chance to respond to your message. Life's so crazy these days!!!!!! I must have a thousand emails in my inbox. I can't imagine how I got so popular. ;-)

Coffee sounds GREAT. Where & When?

1/1/01, 11:07 am
To Sue
From Sally
Got your message. I'll get back to you soon.

1/1/01, 11:07 am
To Sally
From Sue
Great. I look forward to hearing from you.

1/1/01, 11:08 am
To Sue
From Sally
I probably won't know until sometime next month. I'll definitely keep you in the loop as things develop. Hope everything's going really great with you.

1/1/01, 11:09 am
To Sally
From Sue
Terrific. I can't wait to hear.

and so on and so forth.

I think this might explain the advent of instant messaging, cordless phones, Facebook, wireless networks, cell phones, MySpace, Twitter, Second Life and terabyte storage devices.

And I suspect this new development will only make it worse:  Yahoo Mail lets users send free text messages to cell phones




Recent news in category
Whole Foods Market locks stable door after horse bolts (and woofski!)
Teaching an old dog a new trick
Teaching an old dog a new trick

Global recent news
PR no. 13: Basketball Without Borders returns to
Nigerian flip-flop: Linux or Windows for schools? (and Grant vs. Google)
Assn. for Fire Ecology Regional Conference 2008 in Tucson Jan 28th-31st

27/Aug/2007 1:08PM
That's the thing about etiquette. Everybody thinks they're polite, and it's the other guy whose behavior warrants correction. Doug Schweitzer thinks it's rude not to reply to e-mail:It takes just a second to say &quot;Got your message. I'll get back to you soon.&quot; My question: Why should I reply just to say I'll reply some other time? My own complaint is the exact opposite. In fact, I hesitate to e-mail those people who seem to reply immediately to every single message. It's like playing tag. You're it!

27/Aug/2007 1:08PM
That's the thing about etiquette. Everybody thinks they're polite, and it's the other guy whose behavior warrants correction. Doug Schweitzer thinks it's rude not to reply to e-mail:It takes just a second to say &quot;Got your message. I'll get back to you soon.&quot; My question: Why should I reply just to say I'll reply some other time? My own complaint is the exact opposite. In fact, I hesitate to e-mail those people who seem to reply immediately to every single message. It's like playing tag. You're it!

27/Aug/2007 5:46AM
Before the advent of email, when you received a phone message from someone, it was common courtesy to return that call when a response was warranted. With email taking center stage as the communication medium du jour, you would think the same modus operandi would apply. Not so, as I've (especially, lately) sent email to which I've received no response and/or simply been ignored. When I've telephone called in follow-up, the response is, &quot;I got your email but haven't had a chance to respond.&quot; It takes just a second to say &quot;Got your message. I'll get back to you soon.&quot;&nbsp; My wife seems to think that unlike telephone messages, email messages are easier to postpone responding to and are even more easy to blow off entirely.

27/Aug/2007 5:46AM
Before the advent of email, when you received a phone message from someone, it was common courtesy to return that call when a response was warranted. With email taking center stage as the communication medium du jour, you would think the same modus operandi would apply. Not so, as I've (especially, lately) sent email to which I've received no response and/or simply been ignored. When I've telephone called in follow-up, the response is, &quot;I got your email but haven't had a chance to respond.&quot; It takes just a second to say &quot;Got your message. I'll get back to you soon.&quot;&nbsp; My wife seems to think that unlike telephone messages, email messages are easier to postpone responding to and are even more easy to blow off entirely.

27/Aug/2007 5:46AM
Before the advent of email, when you received a phone message from someone, it was common courtesy to return that call when a response was warranted. With email taking center stage as the communication medium du jour, you would think the same modus operandi would apply. Not so, as I've (especially, lately) sent email to which I've received no response and/or simply been ignored. When I've telephone called in follow-up, the response is, &quot;I got your email but haven't had a chance to respond.&quot; It takes just a second to say &quot;Got your message. I'll get back to you soon.&quot;&nbsp; My wife seems to think that unlike telephone messages, email messages are easier to postpone responding to and are even more easy to blow off entirely.

Copyright © 2006 Rootio Ltd. All rights reserved.